By not teaching the VTS or not telling the viewer
what the work is about, we are just asking them to find their own meaning from
their own experiences. Within a group of people you can pull many ideas and
much more experience. What each person’s experiences will be is so different
from the person next to them. So, by not telling the viewer, we are creating a
bigger picture of what is going on in the world today and past experiences. We
also need to grow as viewers and if we are just spoon-fed the meanings of the
artwork no will grow in understanding and take more information away from the
work.
There are many different possibilities that people
can take from asking just one simpler question, “what more can you see”,
changes the ambiguity of the artwork to something more fulfilling that they can
ask more questions of what they are seeing. Part 1 & 2 helps open up the
question, why is this artwork like this or what is in this artwork. If we stop
asking questions and have the freedom to speak our minds on what we see, we
have stopped the process of opening the mind to grow.
The evidence is in the question, what more can we find? With that question being asked of the
viewer, we are asking them to think beyond what is right before them. This
question being asked of viewers is finding a method for them to be able to take
away from their own experiences. The observations of artwork can not just be
something that is not given through names and date, but a more meaningful
journey that help each viewer associates with their own experiences. I find
that with my own students having VTS in the classroom opens up a way for all
students to voice what they see happening in each of the artworks that I
display.
You clearly appreciate and understand the open-ended nature of the VTS questions and what the freedom the questions grant adds to student learning. Based on what Yenawine discussed in parts 1 and 2 of the assigned article, how would you explain/defend “not telling” to an administrator or other educator? What Yenwine ideas would you cite?
ReplyDelete